As we gradually return to normal in our settings and our practice, our environments adapting to meet the needs of the current situation, I have noticed an increasing theme emerging.
Online, through articles, interviews, social media posts, this theme has four key aspects:
- It’s assumed that all children are able to learn in the same way.
- Teaching in Early Childhood Education is seen the same as our approaches with older children.
- The teacher decides what the learning should be.
- The only valuable learning is learning that’s school-based.
There is a core assumption here. That the adult knows best, decides what to ‘teach’, writes the content in advance – a ‘knowledge organiser’ for each child.
Every year. For each year group. Including Early Years.
But now, during the times of this pandemic, it feels like we’re seeing an extension of this. Teachers are working hard to put together schemes of online lessons for their classes to access at home, which, while potentially for older children, are proving a challenge to work appropriately and effectively in the way our youngest children need.
But why is this happening, and why is it such a challenge? And most importantly, what should we be doing instead?
Why do we have teacher-led learning?
Looked at objectively, it seems to be a good idea to have everything planned weeks, months or years in advance. To have a prepared schedule to teach to, that is mapped out across year groups so that everyone knows what is happening – and when.
As adults we often map parts of our lives out like this, especially at work. We make decisions, sometimes individually and sometimes in groups, about plans for how we want or need things to be.
The thing is, this way of working will also work with older children as they develop skills of reflection and reasoning through their years of life experience, meaning that they can usually see why their learning is moving in a certain way and they can link it to other thinking they’ve done.
So why is it not so simple to plan teaching like this with the youngest children?
Well, put simply it is based on less life experience.
Why children in the Early Years need to lead their own learning
“The concept of sensitive periods refers to distinct phases during early childhood when the brain is best able to receive and use information gained from experience, in order to learn specific skills. The period of birth to five specifically represents a sensitive period for babies and children as it represents a time of fervent growth and development, with neural connectivity being at its most prolific.”
What Mine is saying here is that the youngest children learn through experiences and making connections. Planning what will be taught even a week in advance doesn’t allow that to happen.
By constantly working from an adult-conceived plan, this important element is missing. Information will be received and may even be responded to, but without links and experience the learning may not embed or make sense.
Can you teach everything with child-led learning?
So is it possible to teach everything expected from an adult-conceived curriculum through a child-led approach?
I would argue yes, it is. But it requires a skilled teacher who really understands and notices what is happening, reflects and changes plans almost without realising – a true pedagogue.
In order to be able to do this well it is vital to know and understand the expectations of the curriculum you’re working from, but then interpret it through the children. My experience has shown me that it is possible to gain a higher level of involvement and attainment by doing exactly this.
Just how challenging is child-led learning?
I understand why working in this way sounds really difficult. As I said earlier, it can be perceived as easier to work from a pre-set plan.
But is it? It’s vital that we understand the curriculum we are required to teach, and it is our role to impart learning. But it’s not our role to simply give disjointed facts. It actually becomes easier for us and the children to mould our teaching into what the they already know and can do, because it will fit into place for them and embed.
We all too frequently hear that a prescribed curriculum raises standards, or that children can’t learn everything through child-led learning. But as Robin Alexander discusses, there is a fear that this moves our education further away from pedagogy. He argues that even if we do run with a rigid policy or structure, we are not immune from the contexts of culture, self and history.
“It is vital that we do appropriately translate and structure our teaching and learning environments so that they start with the child.”
Decisions made about curriculum may well have been taken out of our hands. But the question we must ask ourselves is whether that means that our pedagogy should be taken too?
Learn more about Famly
Find out below how Famly helped Tenderlinks in recording child development, and see what we can do for you in a personal demo.